Capital Shame!

⊆ 27.12.09 by tUsHAR | ˜ 0 comments »


The pitch at the Ferozeshah Kotla has drawn plenty of flak in the recent past for being slow, low and unsuitable for strokeplay. But on Sunday, in front of a packed house, it was declared unsuitable for cricket itself.

The Sri Lankan visitors, having been put in to bat, had more than a few bruises to show as they reached 83 for five but when, in the 24th over, a 130-kmph half-tracker from debutant Sudeep Tyagi spat off the strip and exploded over a clueless Thilina Kandamby, the captains, coaches, curators, umpires and match officials got into a concerned huddle, before trooping off the field.

The final match of the India-Sri Lanka one-day series was first "suspended" at 11.40 am and then, an hour later, abandoned due to unsuitable playing conditions, sparking a near-riot in the stadium and a blame-game on the sidelines. It also resulted, a couple of hours later, in the disbanding of the BCCI's Pitches and Grounds Committee. And after a lengthy DDCA meeting, the association sent out a release, saying local curator Vijay Bahadur Mishra and Chetan Chauhan, who heads their grounds committee, had resigned.

The spectators were eventually shepherded out of the ground, after hundreds of fiberglass seats had been ripped off and thrown on to the field, already strewn with plastic bottles and other debris. The anger and the damage could probably have been much more had this not been an inconsequential match - India having already sealed the series 3-1.

A one-year international ban on the Kotla could follow as that is the minimum penalty for a first offence of this nature under ICC guidelines. The last time a one-dayer was abandoned due to an unplayable pitch was in Indore - in an India-Sri Lanka game in 1997. More recently at Antigua, a West Indies-England Test match was called off after less than 10 overs after the outfield was deemed unplayable. Both venues were handed one-year suspensions.

"The decision to abandon the match was taken by myself, in consultation with on-field umpires Marais Erasmus and Shavir Tarapore, and both captains as it was clear that the pitch had extremely variable bounce and was too dangerous for further play," ICC match referee Alan Hurst said in a statement. "Before abandoning the match, consideration was given to shifting the match to a secondary pitch. However, it was deemed impractical as the secondary pitch was not adequately prepared."

DDCA president Arun Jaitley apologised to the public. "It is a very serious matter and we will look into it," he said, adding that all gate money would be refunded. Jaitley refused to get drawn into a slanging match that was being played out beyond the boundary, where former curator Radhe Shyam was insisting that BCCI chief curator Daljit Singh be sacked following the fiasco.

Speaking in Pune, former BCCI president Sharad Pawar said, "What happened today at the Ferozeshah Kotla was a national embarrassment."

The Kotla pitch was relaid in April this year, when the entire square was dug up. Since then, the venue has hosted a few low-scoring Champions League T20 games, when it came under criticism from the captains.

During the last one-day international played here, between India and Australia in October, the track had disintegrated rapidly as India chased down 230 for a six-wicket win.

For this match, there was a debate two days ago on which of the two prepared tracks should be used. A decision was taken to go with the pitch on which the last one-dayer had been played, as the alternate had never been used in a match - they obviously wanted to avoid any nasty surprises.

While not all deliveries were darting around dangerously, there were a couple of patches just short of a good length, from where deliveries were either bouncing sharply or darting through at ankle height. This was caused by tufts of grass that had been left on the pitch and rolled into it so as to bind it, to compensate for how rapidly the track used for the India-Australia ODI in October had seemed to disintegrate. Sunil Gavaskar, in his pre-match analysis, called it a "hair-transplant pitch".

"We tested the two pitches using net bowlers and the bounce on this one seemed better. We didn't expect this," DDCA curator Mishra said later. He went on to accuse the Sri Lankans of "running away" as they had already lost five wickets by then, but all the evidence said otherwise.

Daljit Singh, the board's chief curator - and the man under whose guidance this surface was prepared - was not available for comments, while Chetan Chauhan said they would look into the matter. "We accept responsibility for this. Something obviously went very wrong," he said.

In a couple of hours, the board decided to disband its committee with immediate effect. "After the Ahmedabad Test match (which witnessed a high-scoring draw), BCCI president Shashank Manohar had called a meeting of the grounds committee and explained that they would be accountable from then on, that they couldn't keep pointing fingers at local curators. As they were responsible for this pitch, we felt it was best to dissolve the committee," Ratnakar Shetty, the board's chief administrative officer, told The Indian Express.

"We need sporting pitches in India, which is why the BCCI is spending so much money on it. From now on, every association will be accountable for their own pitches," Shetty added.

Sri Lankan team manager Brendon Kurruppu told The Indian Express that the dressing room was worried early in the innings itself, but had decided to play on in the hope that the pitch eased out. "There were 40-50,000 fans who had come to watch, so it was a hard decision. But it was also the right decision."

 

The Garbage Truck

⊆ 13.10.09 by tUsHAR | ˜ 0 comments »

'One day I hopped in a taxi and we took off for the airport. We weredriving in the right lane when suddenly a black car jumped out of a parking

space right in front of us. My taxi driver slammed on his brakes, skidded,
and missed the other car by just inches! The driver of the other car whipped
his head around and started yelling at us. My taxi driver just smiled and
waved at the guy. And I mean, he was really friendly. So I asked, 'Why did
you just do that? This guy almost ruined your car and sent us to the
hospital!' This is when my taxi driver taught me what I now call, 'The Law
of the Garbage Truck.'

He explained that many people are like garbage trucks.. They run around
full of garbage, full of frustration, full of anger, and full of
disappointment. As their garbage piles up, they need a place to dump it and
sometimes they'll dump it on you. Don't take it personally. Just smile,
wave, wish them well, and move on. Don't take their garbage and spread it to
other people at work, at home, or on the streets.. The bottom line is that
successful people do not let garbage trucks take over their day.

Life's too short to wake up in the morning with regrets, so.... Love the
people who treat you right,Forgive the ones who don't!! Life is ten percent
what you make it and ninety percent how you take it!

Have a garbage-free day!'


Attitudes are contagious. Are yours worth catching???


 

Change of Office address

⊆ 22.9.09 by tUsHAR | ˜ 0 comments »

OUR ADDRESS HAS CHANGED, THE NEW ADDRESS IS :

TUSHAR GROUP,

SCS 6, 1ST FLOOR,

D.D.A. GOL MARKET, ROHTAK ROAD,

NEAR BHARTIYA VIDYAPEETHCOLLEGE,

A-4, PASHCHIM VIHAR,

NEW DELHI 110 063

+91 (011) – 65385199


You are requested to update the same in your record.
This was for your update
--
With Warm Regards,

Tushar Dang
+919212222737
"Serving Promplty"

 

Does Cloths Make A Woman

⊆ 2.2.09 by tUsHAR | ˜ 0 comments »

Apparently.

Among other things, the female sex has ALWAYS had to deal with others’ attention and opinion, on their clothes.

Even if we just take India as the context, true, women have more options or lets say variety when it comes to clothing. But nevertheless, the opinions on what one should be wearing all the time, are not justified.

From the time she’s a little girl, there will be strict observation of what she’s supposed to wear. Some parents ( the paranoid variety), wouldn’t let the frocks/skirts be short, even on a 2 year old. So is the case of sleeveless clothes. While similar dangers lurk around the corner for little boys, no one seems to debate the length of their shorts. True?

And as puberty hits, so does paranoia. Dress “decently” (???), conservatively, and attact minimum attention to yourself. Parents, relatives and their dogs, everyone has an opinion on what a girl wears, what is appropriate, and worse, what is her morality, as judged by the clothes worn. I don’t think it gets more bizzare than this.

Salwar kameez preferably with dupatta - Good homely girl from good family or behenji depending on which side of the fence you’re on

Salwar Kameez w/o dupatta - A little alarming, but nevertheless, good enough, not very behenji.

Jeans - Modern, smart ( not always in a good way!).

Skirt - Loose woman, slut. ( The shorter the skirt, higher the slut quotient)

And it doesn’t stop at clothes. Accessories, hair colour, everything that a woman adorns seems to have a connotation. The length of hair decides whether its a “nice” girl ( generally long/shouldger length, preferably untouched by chemicals) , or a modern ass-kicking bitch ( short boy/bob cuts). The ones with streaked hair are apparently the modern types ( in thought…not in fashion!)…so on and so forth. Oh, and if you’re in to shocking hair colours like bright red, or purple etc, you are beyond comprehension

And God forbid, if you decide to get married, everyone including your neighbourhood grocery store owner has an “expectation” on how you should be dressed. ( yes I know I have already ranted about sarees, sindoor, mangalsutra ( jewellery) and stuff. Thank you for reminding.)

Why are only women put under scrutiny when its about outward apprearances. No one seems to care if a guy dresses in jeans for a wedding, or walks in to a pub wearing shorts. They’re all cool, they’re all “nice”. If they end up in sleevless t shirts, its no big deal and almost as good as a normal t shirt. Right??

And if we switch places and women turn up wearing similar clothes to the ones mentioned above, what happens? They are immideately branded. According to what they wear, how they dress. In one slot or the other.

Good girl. Bitch. Homely. Slut. Traditional. Loose. Decent. Modern.

Sexism, so deep rooted, that its taken for granted, and doesn’t qualify as a topic deserving any attention, forget action. Bias, so anti-women, that irrespective of what they wear, they will get slotted, by some person or the other. And more often than not, they will give in, and dress to please others. Irrespective of what they like. Irrespective of where their comfort lies. Irrespective of how stifling it might be, to always adhere to rules made by others, just so that you don’t end up giving the “wrong” impression, or worse, the “wrong” signal…

Any thoughts?